Jump to content
luv2 luv2 (New Member) New Member

Special Council Muller Report

Politics   (10,015 Views 541 Comments)
6,713 Visitors; 136 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.
advertisement

You are reading page 7 of Special Council Muller Report. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

    • Attorney General William Barr
      1
    • House Intelligence Committee
      4
    • Who Cares
      1

6 members have participated

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/20/2019 at 07:28 PM
7 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

Yes, you are correct.  To say people don’t want to pay attention to Kardashian for her political insight is ludicrous.

I will take the high road here, and drop the discussion.

Most posters can see through your position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

 

Of course, it's also on record that you believe that Rush Limbaugh and The Daily Wire are credible sources for news and analysis, so...

26 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Of course, it's also on record that you believe that Rush Limbaugh and The Daily Wire are credible sources for news and analysis, so...

That is correct.  Their analysis as well as some others, like Mark Levin, have been proven to be far more accurate on the Russia hoax than that of the liberal propaganda wing of the media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, toomuchbaloney said:

We all know that the Mueller report WILL be publicly known sooner or later, right? What does stalling and obstructing that release accomplish for the Trump administration?

On the other hand, there wasn’t a rush fir the last two plus years, so why now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps so that Congress, especially the Senate, will be spurred to take steps to prevent or deter Russian interference in upcoming elections? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SC_RNDude said:

On the other hand, there wasn’t a rush fir the last two plus years, so why now?

To state the obvious, because the report is complete.

The American people have the right to see it.

Surely, anyone who respects democracy would understand that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SC_RNDude said:

That is correct.  Their analysis as well as some others, like Mark Levin, have been proven to be far more accurate on the Russia hoax than that of the liberal propaganda wing of the media.

In your opinion.

And since you erroneously equate audience numbers with credibility, I am calling your judgement suspect.

Edited by Lil Nel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
advertisement
41 minutes ago, nursej22 said:

Perhaps so that Congress, especially the Senate, will be spurred to take steps to prevent or deter Russian interference in upcoming elections? 

Sure, that’s why so many are in a tizzy now, isn’t it?

And, anyway is that whose job it is or who any of us would trust to for that job?

no and no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SC_RNDude said:

That is correct.  Their analysis as well as some others, like Mark Levin, have been proven to be far more accurate on the Russia hoax than that of the liberal propaganda wing of the media.

Wait!

Didn't you tell herring you believed the Russians tried to interfere with 2016 election?

Are you now backtracking?

Are you flip-flopping?

Are you confused?

Hoax?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lil Nel said:

In your opinion.

And since you erroneously equate audience numbers with credibility, I am calling your judgement suspect.

What???  YOU are suspect of my judgement.  AhhhHaahaaa..aaaa😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

Sure, that’s why so many are in a tizzy now, isn’t it?

And, anyway is that whose job it is or who any of us would trust to for that job?

no and no.

Interesting.

You don't trust Congress to allocate funding to enhance the voting process, and shore up against foreign influence, yet you trust Trump.

You are ripe for authoritarianism!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

What???  YOU are suspect of my judgement.  AhhhHaahaaa..aaaa😂

I doubt I am the only one.

I am just willing to be direct and honest.

😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Lil Nel said:

To state the obvious, because the report is complete.

The American people have the right to see it.

Surely, anyone who respects democracy would understand that.

We have the right to see it?  We’re going to see it, but whats your source on that it is a right?

Shouldnt innocent people whose names and grand jury testimony be provided the courtesy have having self-identifying information redacted?  Shouldn’t information that may compromise national security be redacted?

Despite you proclaiming that you were staying the obvious, you didn’t answer the question of what is the hurry?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×