Jump to content
luv2 luv2 (New Member) New Member

Special Council Muller Report

Politics   (9,910 Views 540 Comments)
6,701 Visitors; 136 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.
advertisement

You are reading page 6 of Special Council Muller Report. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

    • Attorney General William Barr
      1
    • House Intelligence Committee
      4
    • Who Cares
      1

6 members have participated

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/20/2019 at 07:28 PM
1 hour ago, Lil Nel said:

 

Oh, please.

More nonsense.

If audience size is a measure of credibility, Kim Kardashian is the most credible person in the world.

 

I didn’t realize Kardashian had a news and politics audience.  In that case, I stand corrected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who can think that Limbaugh is more credible than the Wa Po or NYT must have enough imagination to consider Kardashian as a source.  Especially if audience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who can think that Limbaugh is more credible than the Wa Po or NYT must have enough imagination to consider Kardashian as a source.  Especially if audience size is the standard measurement. 

Isnt it funny to consider a media bias comparison my "little chart"? That's a tool used to simply ignore uncomfortable information. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SC_RNDude said:

I didn’t realize Kardashian had a news and politics audience.  In that case, I stand corrected.

Back tracking?

You specifically mentioned audience size.

And Kim Kardashian has a political audience.

She lobbied Trump, at the WH, on behalf of a female TN prisoner, with an excessive sentence.

Trump loves her husband; Kayne West, who has also met Trump at the WH.

So, I believe, according to your criteria, Kim Kardashian, is the most credible person in the world!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Anyone who can think that Limbaugh is more credible than the Wa Po or NYT must have enough imagination to consider Kardashian as a source.  Especially if audience size is the standard measurement. 

Isnt it funny to consider a media bias comparison my "little chart"? That's a tool used to simply ignore uncomfortable information. 

I just took a glance at one of the charts.  I always like to first go to the middle of the road folks first, as the right and left results are predictable.

It looks like 59% of them didn’t know/didn’t answer if Limbaugh was a trusted source, so don’t know what conclusion you can get from that.

More interestingly, 47% of them said Fox News was a trusted source.  That’s much better then the NYT 29% and 23% for the WaPo.  Even sadder news for its followers, WaPo is trusted by only 48% of consistently liberal people. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lil Nel said:

Back tracking?

You specifically mentioned audience size.

And Kim Kardashian has a political audience.

She lobbied Trump, at the WH, on behalf of a female TN prisoner, with an excessive sentence.

Trump loves her husband; Kayne West, who has also met Trump at the WH.

So, I believe, according to your criteria, Kim Kardashian, is the most credible person in the world!

Alright, you’ve convinced me.  Kim Kardashian is right up there with Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and all the rest.

Thank yo for showing me the error of my ways!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
advertisement
27 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

I just took a glance at one of the charts.  I always like to first go to the middle of the road folks first, as the right and left results are predictable.

It looks like 59% of them didn’t know/didn’t answer if Limbaugh was a trusted source, so don’t know what conclusion you can get from that.

More interestingly, 47% of them said Fox News was a trusted source.  That’s much better then the NYT 29% and 23% for the WaPo.  Even sadder news for its followers, WaPo is trusted by only 48% of consistently liberal people. 

 

 

 

It's easy to ignore the multitude of blatantly false and inflammatory comments from Rush Limbaugh when that is the necessary practice; claiming ignorance of the unacceptable words and actions of Trump. It translates well to other propaganda and partisan liars. Preferring Limbaugh as a trusted source only requires one to ignore the multitude of ridiculous theories and unsubstantiated theories that he tosses about unapologetically. 

All while using a media source KNOWN for publishing so many partisan fabrications and alternative facts that is is nearly considered a propaganda site. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

It's easy to ignore the multitude of blatantly false and inflammatory comments from Rush Limbaugh when that is the necessary practice; claiming ignorance of the unacceptable words and actions of Trump. It translates well to other propaganda and partisan liars. Preferring Limbaugh as a trusted source only requires one to ignore the multitude of ridiculous theories and unsubstantiated theories that he tosses about unapologetically. 

All while using a media source KNOWN for publishing so many partisan fabrications and alternative facts that is is nearly considered a propaganda site. 

What does any of that have to do with my comment that you quoted and seemingly then would be replying to?  

Perhaps you find the information I shared from the source you provided to be uncomfortable for you.

 

 

Edited by SC_RNDude
c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SC_RNDude said:

Alright, you’ve convinced me.  Kim Kardashian is right up there with Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and all the rest.

Thank yo for showing me the error of my ways!

I am not trying to convince you of anything.

Instead, I was pointing out the ridiculousness of your statement.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

What does any of that have to do with my comment that you quoted and seemingly then would be replying to?  

Perhaps you find the information I shared from the source you provided to be uncomfortable for you.

It's unfortunate you were unable to glean any meaning from my remarks. That might also explain why you are confused about my comfort level with the media bias rating and comparison. 

Of course, it's also on record that you believe that Rush Limbaugh and The Daily Wire are credible sources for news and analysis, so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We all know that the Mueller report WILL be publicly known sooner or later, right? What does stalling and obstructing that release accomplish for the Trump administration?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Lil Nel said:

I am not trying to convince you of anything.

Instead, I was pointing out the ridiculousness of your statement.

 

Yes, you are correct.  To say people don’t want to pay attention to Kardashian for her political insight is ludicrous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×