Jump to content
luv2 luv2 (New Member) New Member

Special Council Muller Report

Politics   (11,263 Views 543 Comments)
7,083 Visitors; 258 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.
advertisement

You are reading page 4 of Special Council Muller Report. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Who should redact the Muller’s Report?

    • Attorney General William Barr
      1
    • House Intelligence Committee
      4
    • Who Cares
      1

6 members have participated

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/20/2019 at 07:28 PM
4 hours ago, SC_RNDude said:

It is unclear how you have discredited any news report with this link. Is that what Limbaugh or the Daily Wire represent to you, credible analysis of current events?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, SC_RNDude said:

In the link Rush wrote, “Attorney General William Barr's summary of the Mueller report KOed the "collusion" narrative and landed a devastating blow to the Democrats' dream of toppling Trump with an obstruction of justice charge.” 

He did not mention that the Barr summary included that persons associated with the Russian government illegally interfered with our election.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/45581/limbaugh-media-just-did-exactly-what-i-predicted-james-barrett?%3Futm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

It is unclear how you have discredited any news report with this link. Is that what Limbaugh or the Daily Wire represent to you, credible analysis of current events?

Yes, that’s what I said.  More so Limbaugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

Yes, that’s what I said.  More so Limbaugh.

Do you think Russia attacked United States Democracy in 2016?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SC_RNDude said:

Yes, that’s what I said.  More so Limbaugh.

Rush Limbaugh?

A talking head, with zero credibility and a highly partisan view if the world.

I am doubled over with laughter.

😝😝😝😝

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
advertisement
1 hour ago, SC_RNDude said:

Yes, that’s what I said.  More so Limbaugh.

You must be aware that Limbaugh is not a credible or trusted source for political commentary or analysis.

Pew Research Center

The Daily Wire is nearly within a bias category of "propaganda" according to the tables. 

 Media Bias chart

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, herring_RN said:

Do you think Russia attacked United States Democracy in 2016?

I wonder if there is a reason that your question goes unanswered by SC_RNDude. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

I wonder if there is a reason that your question goes unanswered by SC_RNDude. 

😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

I wonder if there is a reason that your question goes unanswered by SC_RNDude. 

Yes, it seems like a simple, straightforward question.

Not difficult at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, toomuchbaloney said:

I wonder if there is a reason that your question goes unanswered by SC_RNDude. 

Maybe I had other things I wished to do and was going to answer when I had more time?  A question I’ve answered before, by the way.

Believe it it not, you folks and your discussion is far from the top of my mind.  You all are a riot.  Thank goodness I have other things to occupy my mind and time.

If you’re  just looking for a yes or no, it’s yes.

So what?  I suppose you’re  going to pretend that the Mueller investigation wasn’t/ isn’t about getting Trump.  The “tick tock” references here, “hurry up Mueller” cheers, the media meltdowns when the summary came out, such as the one from Chris Matthews....all that was about getting the Russians and making sure they don’t interfere again.  🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, SC_RNDude said:

Maybe I had other things I wished to do and was going to answer when I had more time?  A question I’ve answered before, by the way.

Believe it it not, you folks and your discussion is far from the top of my mind.  You all are a riot.  Thank goodness I have other things to occupy my mind and time.

If you’re  just looking for a yes or no, it’s yes.

So what?  I suppose you’re  going to pretend that the Mueller investigation wasn’t/ isn’t about getting Trump.  The “tick tock” references here, “hurry up Mueller” cheers, the media meltdowns when the summary came out, such as the one from Chris Matthews....all that was about getting the Russians and making sure they don’t interfere again.  🤣

I didn't see any "media meltdowns".  But I don't have cable, nor do I read conservatives interpretations of "mainstream media".

The Meuller investigation was to get at the truth as evidenced by the indictments and people sent to jail, none of which was Trump.  As you say, Russia interfered and it was important to understand how and why and who might have played a hand in it.  

Were there people that were salivating at the idea that Trump was going down?  Oh hell yes there were.   We can't sugar coat that idea.  

But to say that an investigation where many people surrounding Trump himself were doing shady things was a "witch hunt" against Trump just doesn't ring true to me.  

Like I said before, I extremely happy that Trump wasn't found colluding.  We don't need that kind of crap going on in our country.

Edited by Tweety

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×