Jump to content
luv2 luv2 (New Member) New Member

Questioning Corey Booker history.

Politics   (259 Views 21 Comments)
7,081 Visitors; 258 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.
advertisement

You are reading page 2 of Questioning Corey Booker history.. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

50 minutes ago, herring_RN said:

Viral image about Democratic senators and 'big pharma' is misleading

A viral post circulating recently in some of the more liberal corners of social media accuses 13 Democratic senators of allegedly voting against lower drug prices because they were recipients of big money from drugmakers.

The post included the names and photographs of 13 Democratic senators — Cory Booker and Bob Menendez of New Jersey, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Tom Carper and Chris Coons of Delaware, Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell of Washington state, Jon Tester of Montana, Mark Warner of Virginia, and Bob Casey Jr. of Pennsylvania. It also listed dollar amounts the senators were said to have received from "big pharma."

Several readers asked us to check the post’s accuracy, so we did. (We’ll set aside the misspelling of Booker’s first name.)...

 We were able to make pretty solid guesses about the underlying reference.

It lines up with the voting results for an amendment voted on by the Senate on Jan. 11, 2017. The amendment is filled with legislative jargon, but it would basically create a mechanism to promote "lower prescription drug prices for Americans by importing drugs from Canada."The measure failed, with 46 votes in favor and 52 against. The 13 Democratic senators targeted in the post were among those 52 votes against...

...   The post, however, includes some errors, and its accuracy is undercut by a significant oversimplification: The image gives no indication that the senators also voted for a separate amendment that explicitly sought to lower drug prices...

...   The senators offered varied reasons for opposing the amendment the viral image refers to. For instance:

 Booker: "I support the importation of prescription drugs as a key part of a strategy to help control the skyrocketing cost of medications. Any plan to allow the importation of prescription medications should also include consumer protections that ensure foreign drugs meet American safety standards. I opposed an amendment put forward last night that didn’t meet this test."...

  ...    The industry donation breakdowns tallied by the Center for Responsive Politics doesn’t just include donations by fat-cat executives and company political action committees. It also includes donations made by any individual employed by a company in a given industry sector. This can include rank-and-file employees -- and in states with a heavy pharmaceutical presence in the workforce, this can be a significant factor. These states include Delaware, represented by Carper and Coons, and New Jersey, represented by Booker and Menendez...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14weYU5xByI/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Booker would be an improvement over Trump. I would vote for him if he was the nominee. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Booker would be an improvement over Trump. I would vote for him if he was the nominee. 

I would too. I will not watch any more of those videos because I am not planning to vote for him in the primary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Booker would be an improvement over Trump. I would vote for him if he was the nominee. 

He will not win against Trump there is too much about Sen. Cory Booker. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, luv2 said:

He will not win against Trump there is too much about Sen. Cory Booker. 

Who do you believe could win against Trump, why? Frankly, no one currently running against Trump has TOO MUCH STUFF, in comparison to Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
advertisement
28 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Who do you believe could win against Trump, why? Frankly, no one currently running against Trump has TOO MUCH STUFF, in comparison to Trump.

I am not sure who could win. Trump has huge support in the electoral college states. I  am going to watch the debates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If one is of the mindset that the business elite is part of the problem in politics then he probably isn't the candidate.   

I'd like a candidate that doesn't do their bidding against the better interests of all of us, and reins in their privilege, but also doesn't demonize them the way Sanders does.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tweety said:

If one is of the mindset that the business elite is part of the problem in politics then he probably isn't the candidate.   

I'd like a candidate that doesn't do their bidding against the better interests of all of us, and reins in their privilege, but also doesn't demonize them the way Sanders does.  

I totally agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×