Jump to content
CBlover

CBlover

Registered User
advertisement

Content by CBlover

  1. What are everyone’s opinions on the news of New York’s passing full term abortion legislation? Mine in one word: horrified.
  2. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    I am not allowed to counter huh. I didn't argue with chare or BC . I appreciated their input. Where are you getting that? I did add the photo of the Twitter post of the OB doc that i found. They "countered me" can I not say something in return that includes facts as well? Good heavens. It's like if a conservative voices something on here (I haven't said one thing about Tru...). (By the way pro-life has been a part of conservatism for decades in case anyone forgot. Tru** didn't invent it. lol) Now Lil Nel is bitter bc I agreed with SC RN Dude that some people can't take what they dish out. She pulled that over from one forum to another. In my opinion, she's outright mean. You don't have to be like that to have debate. Can we not have a civil conservation regarding this topic without demeaning each other's viewpoints? It's ok to disagree and it's ok to counter. I am allowed to do so too.
  3. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    I couldn't open the article from Chare. I "tried reading" it.
  4. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    Hypocrisy about what?? Yes I have someone on here I happen to agree with. Is that ok with you? I don't have to agree with you Nel. You don't hold the universal truths. I don't either. We can disagree. And when did I name call for heavens sakes?? Show me!!! I am not trying to cloud truth Nel. I was open to what BC said and told you all I am trying to find out what the actual truth is here. A doctor posted on Twitter as I showed you with the attachment a few posts ago that he has never seen or heard of a case where a full term infant needed murdering to save the mother. That's all I am saying. Sheesh.
  5. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    I've been trying to do my own research on what would necessitate it AND what does the new law actually say. I welcome any actual factual information. I want more than what CNN has to offer or Fox News. That's hard to find.
  6. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    It's like you can't even question the abortion of FULL TERM INFANTS (aka baby) with a liberal without them implying your insane. Yawn.
  7. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    Lil Nel how am I spreading misinformation? What have I said on here that is untrue??? All ive done is offer my opinion about it. Don't get triggered so easily. And what do you mean "That's not what this is about." I think IT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. Either you agree with killing full term infants in the womb or you're iffy about it and wonder what in the world would necessitate it. What the heck is wrong with people??
  8. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    I was going to leave this alone, but I can't. I can't stop thinking number 1, about what ElkPark said and the quite frankly, lack of heart in that, and then that you quote MY response and say I'm trolling?! I posted this to get different views. However, I didn't expect one like ElkPark's. He says he's "delighted" to see full term abortions legalized in NY and when I'm like wow that's bold and maybe kinda heartless, you're like "That is TROLLING" Really??!!
  9. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    Wow. Just wow. Delighted in murder of full term infants. Special person you are.
  10. CBlover

    New York passes Full Term Abortion

    In response to what BC said regarding this legislation to “save mothers”...
  11. CBlover

    The Caravan

    No. But are you saying you agree they should have legal documents to provide as I said? I dare you to agree with me ...
  12. CBlover

    The Caravan

    You make no point here. First you say there's no "historical precedent." Then you say "what happened in the recent past when caravans have arrived?"
  13. CBlover

    The Caravan

    So you call our troops being in Afghanistan since Oct 7, 2001 a "reasonable expectation," but some troops sent to patrol the border props of politics. And the latter is your opinion. Dude! I have a legit question. Do you think these in the caravan should just be allowed to flock over without proper paperwork?!? Seriously. Yes or no.
  14. CBlover

    The Caravan

    The militarytimes also states, "Instead, their role will largely mirror that of the existing National Guard troops - about 2,000 in all - deployed to the border over the past six months, including providing helicopter support for border missions, installing concrete barriers and repairing and maintaining vehicles. The new troops will include military police, combat engineers and helicopter companies equipped with advanced technology to help detect people at night." Not useless. Yes it would be great if they could have spent Thanksgiving at home. Too bad that caravan of thousands of migrants didn't stop and think of that! These servicemen didn't get drafted for heavens sakes. They signed up for this!! Just like we did. I'm at work right now. In ED triage. (No patients coming in thankfully.)
  15. CBlover

    The Caravan

    So I found this on militarytimes.com. It says "The more than 5200 troops being sent by President Donald Trump to the U.S.-Mexico border will be limited in what they can do under a federal law that restricts the military from engaging in law enforcement on American soil. That means the troops will not be allowed to detain immigrants, seize drugs from smugglers or have any direct involvement in stopping a migrant caravan that is still about 1,000 miles from the nearest border crossing." They are limited on what they can do but sending them isn't illegal from what I can find. I could be wrong.
  16. CBlover

    The Caravan

    Wow so if we were say, actually invaded by Germany back in WW2 on the homeland it would have been illegal to send troops to protect our border??? I'm not against learning something. Would you mind adding some info or a link?
  17. CBlover

    The Caravan

    There's nothing I abhor more than some of these "Jeff Flake's." Believe me.
  18. CBlover

    The Caravan

    I said liberals AND republicans.
  19. CBlover

    The Caravan

    Washington Post "The Multilayered Uselessness of Sending US Troops to the Border Right Now" https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/31/multi-layered-uselessness-sending-troops-border-right-now/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4a6da37a9b6b Sending troops to block caravan at Mexico border is waste, fraud and abuse Oregon's Governor Kate Brown tweeted: If @realDonaldTrump asks me to deploy Oregon Guard troops to the Mexico border, I'll say no. As Commander of Oregon's Guard, I'm deeply troubled by Trump's plan to militarize our border. Nancy Pelosi tweeted "Donald Trump is using every cynical political trick in the book to ignite anti-immigrant fervor. Needlessly militarizing our southern border won't make Americans more safe - it's just another political calculation." lol just a few It's a complete freak-out. If one can't understand the President wanting to reign in thousands of folks just marching across the border to make their home here, I question your sanity. They can come LEGALLY LIKE MY OWN HUSBAND DID. We forked out OUR OWN MONEY for him to become a citizen. Lots of time. Lots of waiting. Lots of money. He was BROKE as all get out. Got a work permit. Got a job. Paid for it HIMSELF. SO CAN THEY. Insert smiling sarcastic face RIGHT HERE.
  20. CBlover

    The Caravan

    The laughable part is that establishment politicians, liberals and republicans, will send 1000s of troops to Afghanistan to protect them and their sovereignty/borders, but when Pres Trump sends troops to our own border it becomes "CRUEL AND YOU ARE AN EVIL MONSTER. STOP THIS NOW!!!!" from all the same idiots.
  21. CBlover

    NRA is at it again

    You have to be deranged to believe that we need to start making toy trains white or black or it's going to be "racist" or "divisive." I'll quote LilNel who said "the inappropriateness should be evident to just anybody." The inappropriateness starts with people throwing around this stupid logic that trains are of some freaking race. I'll say it again THEY ARE TRAINS THEY ARE TRAINS THEY ARE TRAINS. Of course Dana could've avoided the sarcasm----- IT WAS SARCASM-----of putting them in KKK hoods. You all know good and well she was being snark as all of you are on a daily basis on here. It's stupid we have to even have this conversation. LIBERALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  22. CBlover

    NRA is at it again

    What's stupid Nel is that we have to assign race to EVERY FREAKING THING NOW. EVEN TRAINS FOR GOD'S SAKES!!!!! COME ON!!!!
  23. CBlover

    NRA is at it again

    Basically Dana was saying "THEYRE TRAINS FOR GODS SAKES" I mean really. They ARE TRAINS.
  24. CBlover

    NRA is at it again

    I read the story and Dana Loesch was being sarcastic. Basically saying "Oh so Thomas has been part of the KKK and we didn't know it?!?!"
  25. CBlover

    Am I Mean?

    I make more money than my husband by about $8-10/hr. Quite frankly never once did I even think I would NOT marry him because of his job and money. When I married him he was here on a student visa, broke as hell. But we loved each other and I knew that's all that mattered. But that's just me. You have to do what makes you happy. We've been married 6 years and have a 3 year old son. He's a great dad and husband.
×