What no rebuttal? You made a claim, now back it up. You are deflecting now.
After returning from Europe last week, I can see the ill-effects of letting in thousands of migrants without proper vetting. Europeans are upset. Crimes are up, rapes are increased tenfold in many cities within Sweden and Germany. The local media is almost universally regretful of the decision to let in a million majority uneducated young males (you didn't actually think it was mostly families did you? Look up the UN stats) looking for hand-outs. The ill-effects aren't seen in America, but over there its painfully obvious and Merkel & Co are going to lose their heads for it. The happy go lucky welcoming of the migrants is all but gone but news sources such as Huffington Post still love to beat the drum of the downtrodden middle class Syrian family fleeing to a better life.All the Europeans I talked to whether liberal or conservative leaning were calling for immediate closed borders and deportation for those criminally charged, not complaint with seeking employment or not Syrians. Per the UN over 80% of the migrants aren't even Syrian.
But I digress.
No I don't, agree with segregating Muslims or banning religions. I do agree with increased background checks for immigrants coming from countries with terrorist connections. I do not agree with any bans on a group of people nor do I actually see them coming to fruition. One must make a demarcation between actual law/proposals and campaign rhetoric.
Like Hitler? Here we go with hyperbole's again. Drop Hitler from your argument it has no place at all here. Hitler had the Gestapo, Einsatzgruppen, SS and Brown Shirts to systematically identify, harass, gather, experiment and exterminate Jews. Literally it's almost offensive to make a comparison.