We are at war. In Afghanistan, Iraq and most recently Yemen.
We know that old Bill is going to have a role with the economy and he is in favor of the TPP. His wife has been talking about invading Iran and even using nuclear weapons if needed. She is funded by war profiteers whose business model is regime changes and the industry of death. See video.
Hypothetically, I believe that Trump would be less dangerous because he will not kow tow to Saudi and Israel as our POTUS and SOS have been doing since when, 2000? Yes, the man is totally out of his depth, a climate change denier, and unfit to be president. He knows less than I do about economics. He said he would default on the deficit and the dollar fell last week just from that. His tax plan is smoke and mirrors.
As long as Trump doesn't take super pac$ he will at least retain that little bit of credibilty.
On the plus side, Trump doesn't have a "Foundation" or a "Global Initiative" for the purpose of laundering bribes through foreign banks. Any cronyism wont be anywhere on the scale of the hil-bil arms deals.
Also, as Jimmy Carter says, Clinton did very little as SOS to achieve peace and at least Trump is "malleable."
Trump is a marketing genius who gets ratings and has been given a billion in free airtime. According to a former staffer, his speeches are based on what people say to Rush Limbaugh. His isolationist/xenophobic foreign policy appeals to a lot of people. Either he is going to walk it back and throw the election to Clinton or promise Soc Sec expansion and Full medicare/ single payer, in which case he will win. The independent vote, 42% of the electorate, is evenly split between Trump and Sanders. He could get in. Hypothetically.