It wasn't about teaching ID.
It was about informing the students that some people believed differently.
But you have convieniently given a good argument for removal of many of the tenets of evolution from science curriculum.
The judge's comments about intelligent design were spot on accurate, but they didn't apply to the case he ruled on. The people weren't trying to teach intelligent design, or promote religion. Right ruling, wrong case.
The people who filed a complaint about their children being informed that some people (of no particular persuasion, religious or otherwise), were not a bunch of conservatives.