Jump to content
Kyrshamarks

Kyrshamarks

Registered User
advertisement

Activity Wall

  • Kyrshamarks last visited:
  • 610

    Content

  • 0

    Articles

  • 22,202

    Visitors

  • 1

    Followers

  • 0

    Points

  1. Kyrshamarks

    Where are the healthcare professionals?

    That's funny, because I don't know of one who is for single payer health care.
  2. Kyrshamarks

    The Congressional Committee Hearings

    People are saying he released "classified: information, the thing is though he has the power to do that at will. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/ Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president. The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Department of Navy vs. Egan -- which addressed the legal recourse of a Navy employee who had been denied a security clearance -- addresses this line of authority. "The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will." In fact, Robert F. Turner, associate director of the University of Virginia's Center for National Security Law, said that "if Congress were to enact a statute seeking to limit the president’s authority to classify or declassify national security information, or to prohibit him from sharing certain kinds of information with Russia, it would raise serious separation of powers constitutional issues."
  3. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    Actually there are five COUNTIES that surround the NYC area that accounted for the margin that clinton won the popular vote by. So yes, five counties
  4. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    The five counties of New York City alone could decide the presidential winner based in only popular vote.
  5. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    Without the electoral college, 5 that's right 5 counties total would decide every presidential race by sheer population . Is that fair to the rest if the country. It says your vote doesn't count at all so don't bother voting. That is true voter suppression as well as opening a a whole big old bag of voter fraud.
  6. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    But being liberal, I thought meant liking government handouts? You guys can't have it both ways...
  7. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    That idea has been floated around several times. The first time the US government tried to buy it was in 1946. Nice attempt though at attacking President Trump though.
  8. Kyrshamarks

    The President Donald Trump Thread

    Actually one. All the synagogue and Mosque shooters except for one have been liberal.
  9. Kyrshamarks

    Presidential Election 2020

    Darn autocorrect. Not tactless but rather fact less.
  10. Kyrshamarks

    Presidential Election 2020

    And how is my claim tactless? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-04-19/two-texas-oil-towns-among-metros-with-fastest-population-growth&ved=2ahUKEwj7qsKxnPfiAhUFEawKHTRFCQ4QFjANegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2Y7SGAVfJs2LaHBaSqqj-Y&ampcf=1 This link is from 1 month ago. I assume Bloomberg is a good enough source?
  11. Kyrshamarks

    Presidential Election 2020

    Typical wrong answer. Odessa, TX may not be the "glamorous" city LA is or SF is, bit they are ranked in the top 25 high growth areas of the US. People are moving there left and right. They have an unemployment rate of just 2.6%. Median house prices there are 139,000. They have a construction boom in housing and a severe shortage of homes and apartments. How about next time reading some stats before disparaging someplace cuz it sounds Podunk to you.
  12. Kyrshamarks

    Mental Health Checks

    Furthermore, no one has yet out forward why it is ok to put means testing on the second amendment but not the other amendments.
  13. Kyrshamarks

    Mental Health Checks

    Nope, not pissed, not surprised. Not attacking even when my own mental health is questioned by people here. Just pointing out the disparity of some people's beliefs.
  14. Kyrshamarks

    Mental Health Checks

    Typical hypocrisy. Get pissed off and attack when confronted with a truth you don't like. Attacked the poster but not the issue.
  15. Kyrshamarks

    Mental Health Checks

    I actually am NOT advocating mental health checks for those things in my post. What I have done is shown the hypocritical view of some posters here. I chose those two things on purpose. They both are protected constitutional rights. There cannot be any means testing for a person to exercise them. now let's talk about another constitutional right. The 2nd amendment. Many people here who said we can't put mental health checks on thise two rights want to do just that to the right to bear arms. I argue that both the right to vote and religion can be far more dangerous than guns.... You cannot put means testing on one right and say it's not doable for another right.
×

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Privacy, Cookies, and Terms of Service Policies to learn more.