Jump to content
Tweety Tweety (Member) Expert Nurse

General Election 2012 Thread

Politics   (99,394 Views 2,843 Comments)
6 Followers; 50,615 Visitors; 28,317 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.

It's horribly early, but I'm going there anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's horribly early, but I'm going there anyway.

Aw, do we HAVE to?? :crying2::clown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know how I feel about Ron Paul. :D I'll be voting for him in the primaries.

If anyone other than him actually wins the Republican nomination, I won't vote for them, but if Dr. Paul wins, he's probably got my vote for prez. He leaves social issues alone, like you said, and he out-lefts Obama on war and military spending. :up: I am probably the only person I agree with 100% on everything, but I appreciate that Dr. Paul has consistent views, unlike his colleagues.

PS - Tweety: he's not 'elderly'. He's 'mature.' :redbeathe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing: What the Tea Party has become is NOT the same as what it originally started out as when Ron Paulians started it. Just sayin', since I saw the article titled 'Tea Party Godfather'...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the article invented that "Godfather of the Tea Party", it's been around, because he did hold one of the first modern "tea parties", and I do imagine he'd want to distance himself from them...if he has any sense at all.

While he might not be "elderly" at 75 he's old. Which doesn't mean a thing to me, except that it's interesting that so many young people (like you) are behind him. I think because there are conservative young people that are anti-government interference in their lives, and don't like the social stance of some republicans (like their anti-gay marriage stance since they are likely to know GBLT people)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aw, do we HAVE to?? :crying2::clown:

Don't make me find posts where you yourself have discussed the 2012 election. :lol2::lol2::lol2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that article didn't invent the title - it's been around on libertarian sites for quite a while. I was just clarifying, so there's no confusion. And Dr. Paul has distanced himself multiple times from what the TP has morphed into; whether or not he has put into so many words that he's not one of them, he has over and over criticized their platform.

As for elderly vs. old...you say 'tomato', I say 'tomahto'. :lol2: He keeps in excellent shape and I hope I am half that healthy when I'm 75.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being closer to 75 than you are Elvish, I'm careful how I choose my words. Just like "age ain't nothing but a number" "old" ain't nothing but a word. "Elderly" wasn't a good choice of words because the image associated is frailty and that's not fair to him. But you certainly can't say he's middle aged. He's old and you're young, but like I said, that doesn't mean anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dear stepfather is 95, and I'm always telling him he's not old yet. Won't be old 'til he gets to 100. (His mom died at 106, and he's in great shape now, so it's a distinct possibility!) So both you and Dr. Paul fall into the 'not old yet' category. :D

Off-topic alert: Dad called me flipping out about five years ago because the doctor diagnosed him with 'borderline diabetes'. Translation: his fasting blood sugar was *slightly* elevated (we're talking 115 or so). I told him to quit worrying, that he only reason he got diagnosed with it was that he'd lived long enough. Considering that he eats a very healthy diet anyway, I told him to eat whatever the hell he wanted at 90 years young (which is basically what the doc told him as well).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×