Jump to content

First Janet Jackson, Now Nipple Video Banned

Lounge   (2,582 Views 12 Comments)
10,451 Visitors; 4,004 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.

http://news1.iwon.com/odd/article/id/404730|oddlyenough|05-21-2004::11:47|reuters.html

first janet jackson, now nipple video bannedmay 21, 11:42 am et

 

dublin (reuters) - four months after janet jackson outraged the united states by bearing her breast on tv, ireland has banned a video to encourage voting in next month's european elections because it shows a bare nipple.

 

 

in britain, where bare breasts are shown daily in tabloid newspapers, the film will be shown in censored form. the breast-feeding sequence survives but shots of the offending nipple have been edited out.

 

the 45-second film was produced by the european parliament's audio-visual department and shows a suckling baby trying to decide which of its mother's breasts to feed from.

 

the idea is to show people making choices -- like voters at the ballot box.

 

while the sight of a baby suckling at its mother's breast is considered acceptable for hundreds of millions of other europeans, irish officials believe it would cause offence in roman catholic ireland.

 

"i decided that due to sensitivities here, this is not the right image to promote anything in ireland, unless it is of a medical or scientific nature," the head of the european parliament's irish office, jim o'brien, said.

 

ireland, where over 90 percent of the population is catholic, is traditionally conservative on issues of sexuality. abortion is illegal and homosexuality was decriminalized only in 1993.

 

jackson caused a furor in february when in a super bowl halftime performance her duet partner justin timberlake ripped open her costume to expose her right breast during a live coast-to-coast telecast by american network cbs.

 

in britain, film advert regulators found the suckling shot racy, likening the image to "the sort of breast shot you would associate with a men's magazine."

 

a member of the four-man, four-woman cinema advertising association (caa) panel, which took the decision, said they found that they ended up looking at the breast and not the baby.

 

"it was literally the breast full screen size with an erect nipple side on and the infant gazing across at them," said greg lyons, a copy consultant at the caa.

 

"the panel found themselves looking at something that was very difficult for them," he said. "the infant was contemplating the breasts in rather an adult way."

 

rosie dodds, policy research officer for britain's national childbirth trust, said the advert could have been innovative and striking. "i do think it is a pity that we make the link between the sexuality of breasts and their nutritive function," she said.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://news1.iwon.com/odd/article/id/404730|oddlyenough|05-21-2004::11:47|reuters.html

first janet jackson, now nipple video bannedmay 21, 11:42 am et

 

dublin (reuters) - four months after janet jackson outraged the united states by bearing her breast on tv, ireland has banned a video to encourage voting in next month's european elections because it shows a bare nipple.

 

 

in britain, where bare breasts are shown daily in tabloid newspapers, the film will be shown in censored form. the breast-feeding sequence survives but shots of the offending nipple have been edited out.

 

the 45-second film was produced by the european parliament's audio-visual department and shows a suckling baby trying to decide which of its mother's breasts to feed from.

 

the idea is to show people making choices -- like voters at the ballot box.

 

while the sight of a baby suckling at its mother's breast is considered acceptable for hundreds of millions of other europeans, irish officials believe it would cause offence in roman catholic ireland.

 

"i decided that due to sensitivities here, this is not the right image to promote anything in ireland, unless it is of a medical or scientific nature," the head of the european parliament's irish office, jim o'brien, said.

 

ireland, where over 90 percent of the population is catholic, is traditionally conservative on issues of sexuality. abortion is illegal and homosexuality was decriminalized only in 1993.

 

jackson caused a furor in february when in a super bowl halftime performance her duet partner justin timberlake ripped open her costume to expose her right breast during a live coast-to-coast telecast by american network cbs.

 

in britain, film advert regulators found the suckling shot racy, likening the image to "the sort of breast shot you would associate with a men's magazine."

 

a member of the four-man, four-woman cinema advertising association (caa) panel, which took the decision, said they found that they ended up looking at the breast and not the baby.

 

"it was literally the breast full screen size with an erect nipple side on and the infant gazing across at them," said greg lyons, a copy consultant at the caa.

 

"the panel found themselves looking at something that was very difficult for them," he said. "the infant was contemplating the breasts in rather an adult way."

 

rosie dodds, policy research officer for britain's national childbirth trust, said the advert could have been innovative and striking. "i do think it is a pity that we make the link between the sexuality of breasts and their nutritive function," she said.

 

 

 

 

you really have to wonder, don't people have more pressing problems to concern themselves with? and whoever thinks that an "infant contemplates breast in a rather adult way," is in dire need of psychiatric help. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep I was thinking the same thing about the infant contemplating the nipple. Dear Lord! I've said it before and I'll say it again....breasts were made for feeding our children not for men's pleasure and if everyone would realize that, we could all show our boobs all we wanted!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was said ad nauseum in January here; it's not about a boob,but HOW it was presented. I am soooo tired of Janet Jackson and her stupid boob. Ugh. She got what she wanted; attention and music sales. It was clever but tasteless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always wondered what the big deal is with breasts. Everyone freaks whenever once happens to show itself in public as if our entire society is going to collapse. If it were up to me - women would have the right to go topless. Then, I can almost garrentee in a few months no one is going to care about them. My guess is we would actuslly start asking some women to cover them up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the archives. this one was hashed out VERY extensively when it happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmmmmmm....now maybe THAT's what I should do my argumentative paper on...whether boobs need to be covered or not! hmmmmmm......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm seriously thinking about it, Deb. I'm looking through the archives now to see what kinds of arguments there are there! LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This was said ad nauseum in January here; it's not about a boob,but HOW it was presented.

Exactly. I take exception when someone like Janet Jackson decides for me what my children will see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Privacy, Cookies, and Terms of Service Policies to learn more.