Jump to content
MassED MassED (New Member) New Member

FBI reopens its investigation into Hillary

Politics   (5,067 Views 91 Comments)
20,065 Visitors; 438 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.

You are reading page 2 of FBI reopens its investigation into Hillary. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

Why FBI Director Made Clinton Email Announcement Now

I'm sure like before, it's just going to show that people were doing their jobs 24/7 and working hard, and not an act of treason. However, I certainly can't blame the right for all the rhetoric they can spew in these final days. Good timing for them.

Justice officials warned FBI that Comey’s decision to update Congress was not consistent with department policy - The Washington Post

This article seems to disagree with the Newsweek article. Nonetheless, I think this is a storm in a teacup as nothing new has actually been revealed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? Re-opened case today. Unprecedented. None of us, obviously, know what the FBI will divulge and there are plenty of talking heads giving their opinions.

Does anyone think Comey would go through reopening his investigation if what he and his team HAD found was nothing? Especially this close to an election, this impacts her for sure.

Actually, I think he is desperate to serve up something dirty on Clinton. To my eyes, he is clearly biased against her. He was on the Sunday morning talk circuit after closing the investigation with the decision NOT to indict, saying that he felt she had been careless and irresponsible. As the head of the country's highest law enforcement body, giving loud and public voice to his personal feelings about an investigation, especially one that didn't even produce an indictment, was highly unprofessional.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, I think he is desperate to serve up something dirty on Clinton. To my eyes, he is clearly biased against her. He was on the Sunday morning talk circuit after closing the investigation with the decision NOT to indict, saying that he felt she had been careless and irresponsible. As the head of the country's highest law enforcement body, giving loud and public voice to his personal feelings about an investigation, especially one that didn't even produce an indictment, was highly unprofessional.

In fact, it was unprecedented.

And now this.

I suspect that after the election there will be some fallout from his partisan choices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article seems to disagree with the Newsweek article. Nonetheless, I think this is a storm in a teacup as nothing new has actually been revealed.they won't release anything until their investigation is complete, just as in July. Why would anyone think information will be released during an active investigation? They won't. The left is trying to salvage what they can before the election, in the public's eye, to give the last ditch impression she is innocent. It's all she has at this point.

Of course the Justice Department is ticked with Comey, they are in bed with the Clinton's. He may be finally doing the right thing because of pressure applied within, perhaps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Considering we've gotten no updates on the investigation into Trump's affairs with the Russia hack, it does seem odd.
why does everyone assume Trump had anything to do with the hack? It's funny that if there's a hack, the left assume it must be related to Trump, obviously, as no one else would be on the right side of politics looking to take down a monster.

They have no idea who the hackers are, bottom line, all they know is the information released seems to point the left candidate and their team as cheaters, liars, colluders. And the problem is...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you lose Hiliary enemy Judge Jeanine Comey of Fox News, then there's a problem. (Of course she says she should have been indicted long ago, but that's not the point).

Judge Jeanine: Comey's Announcement 'Disgraces and Politicizes the FBI' | Fox News Insider

It seems that quite a number of people are surprised at the level of partisan pandering that Comey is engaged in. As I said previously, I suspect that there will be real consequences politically and professionally for Comey after the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why does everyone assume Trump had anything to do with the hack?

I don't think that Trump masterminded the hack. First of all, I don't think he's intelligent enough and besides, there's too much evidence suggesting different culprits. It's no secret that Julian Wikileaks Assange has a strong personal dislike for Secretary Clinton which dates back several years. President Putin hardly wants Hillary Clinton elected as US President as she likely wouldn't grant him carte blanche and turn a blind eye at his ambitions to expand his nation's territorial borders and sphere of power.

Donald however isn't completely without blame. He did after all encourage a foreign power to meddle in the US election at one of his rallies: Russia if you are listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.

Russians 'likely responsible' for Clinton campaign hack | Fox News

They have no idea who the hackers are, bottom line, all they know is the information released seems to point the left candidate and their team as cheaters, liars, colluders. And the problem is...?

I would have thought the problem is obvious. Someone or something, likely a foreign power/foreign national is trying to influence the outcome of your Presidential election. Anyone who cares about their own country ought to find that deeply worrisome. This, and not the ridiculous "rigged" polls/election accusations is what you should be discussing. I'm amazed how easily some people will sacrifice their own integrity simply because this time the interference in your election seems to be helping their candidate.

To me that's spineless. One might even call it unpatriotic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why does everyone assume Trump had anything to do with the hack? It's funny that if there's a hack, the left assume it must be related to Trump, obviously, as no one else would be on the right side of politics looking to take down a monster.

They have no idea who the hackers are, bottom line, all they know is the information released seems to point the left candidate and their team as cheaters, liars, colluders. And the problem is...?

You shouldn't generalize with blanket statements like "everyone". It does seem interesting that he called on Russia to hack and when the hack occurred he decided despite evidence to the contrary that Russia had nothing to do with it.

People make flying leaps all the time that might not be fair. So presuming Trump is behind the hacks just because he called for it and benefited it from it really is a stretch. But back to the stretch at hand: Mrs. Clinton used a private server as part of her master plan to destroy this great nation of ours. Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It seems that quite a number of people are surprised at the level of partisan pandering that Comey is engaged in. As I said previously, I suspect that there will be real consequences politically and professionally for Comey after the election.
there probably will be, and had he not come forward, that would have been the case, anyway. I would imagine if he is coming forward now, he felt compelled to and damn the consequences, because he is going to do the right thing (finally). I would actually respect him now if he brought forward issues that he feel brings to light a new situation where he had to amend his decision. Whereas before, he caved to political pressure. I'm sure Lynch colluded with Bill prior to Comey's announcement and she is just boiling mad because he did this on his own. Good for Comey for now (potentially) not being establishment and bending towards the crooked power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You shouldn't generalize with blanket statements like "everyone". It does seem interesting that he called on Russia to hack and when the hack occurred he decided despite evidence to the contrary that Russia had nothing to do with it.

People make flying leaps all the time that might not be fair. So presuming Trump is behind the hacks just because he called for it and benefited it from it really is a stretch. But back to the stretch at hand: Mrs. Clinton used a private server as part of her master plan to destroy this great nation of ours. Carry on.

we know he did not call on the Russians to hack, be honest now. He said if the could, they should - more as a tongue in cheek comment.

and Mrs. Clinton obviously is living to regret the day she made all of her decisions - for her gross negligence of national security (that anyone in a lesser position would be in prison for) at a minimum, and allowing hostile nations access. Uh huh, ok. Keep believin' in your gal. If anyone is to blame about Russian hacks, it is her, for so carelessly putting it out there for them (and anyone to access). Who cares if Trump said, hey go ahead and try.... clearly whoever is responsible should be courted to work for us for they have talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
×