Jump to content
Tweety Tweety (Member) Expert Nurse

Donald Trump as GOP hopeful: Take him seriously

Politics   (85,350 Views 1,798 Comments)
6 Followers; 52,362 Visitors; 28,899 Posts
If you find this topic helpful leave a comment.

You are reading page 127 of Donald Trump as GOP hopeful: Take him seriously. If you want to start from the beginning Go to First Page.

She and quite a few others in the Administration, lied repeatedly about what happened in Benghazi. She also lied about her emails, her private server.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The idea that Obama race baits and is talking all the time about race is not new in right wing media. So the fact that this campaign manager parroted it, whether the chair for the GOP thought her comments were insane, isn't unusual. Trump is running a campaign mostly based on race baiting.

I did actually watch the Guardian video. It seems that some people are voting for Trump out of desperation. I did enjoy the interview with the former social worker at the church.

I haven't noticed any race baiting by Obama. I fear he is "guilty" of Presidenting while black.

Sure, ok. Good luck with that angle, based totally in fantasy. :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What could he possibly gain by that? Doesn't make sense. However, we'll agree to disagree. You give no examples, but I'm probably sure what you would call "fanning the flames" I would call being real and bringing it up for discussion, calling it like it is. Qualities that seem to be admired in Mr. Trump btw
You don't see Obama constantly discussing race? He hires only those of color to power positions. Seems race is the only thing he values. There are examples everywhere. When he chimes in a cases from Trayvon and personalizing it "if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon" - for instance. Do you not see how commenting and personalizing something fans flames of racism? Even before FACTS are known?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure, ok. Good luck with that angle, based totally in fantasy. :confused:

So a candidate that retweets White Supremacist posts, characterizes an entire population as rapists and murderers, tells predominately white audiences that present conditions for African Americans are worse than slavery, and hires the editor of an Alt Right web site is not race baiting?

Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With Hillary's track record of lying, while in office, I honestly do not trust one thing she ever says. That millions think that is not important baffles me.
Hillary supporters do not care that she lied, that she completely handed over sensitive and secret information essentially to hostile parties. They do not believe that Benghazi happened the way the SURVIVORS say it happened. They believe good ol cankles, no matter what. They do not care that she doesn't give a crap about them. All the Hillary supporters care about is to have a female in office. The hostile kind of female, yay for those women's libbers. Those sycophants are the ones that I don't want on my side, the side of logical, reasonable, attempts to be unbiased, fair, honest, and wanting to seek the truth. The lickspittlers (look it up) will never see the side of reason, because they are so biased towards their own fantasy version of what they believe they want and to be true. Doesn't seem there will every be any way for them to see reality. I just hope the rest of us ARE the majority and eventually the others will be forced to see HRC for what she truly is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that a thread about Trump and talk of his mendacity gets diverted to Clinton.

As Tweety posted, Trump's lies focus on his self-aggrandizement, and Clinton's concern her privacy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hillary supporters do not care that she lied, that she completely handed over sensitive and secret information essentially to hostile parties. They do not believe that Benghazi happened the way the SURVIVORS say it happened. They believe good ol cankles, no matter what. They do not care that she doesn't give a crap about them. All the Hillary supporters care about is to have a female in office. The hostile kind of female, yay for those women's libbers. Those sycophants are the ones that I don't want on my side, the side of logical, reasonable, attempts to be unbiased, fair, honest, and wanting to seek the truth. The lickspittlers (look it up) will never see the side of reason, because they are so biased towards their own fantasy version of what they believe they want and to be true. Doesn't seem there will every be any way for them to see reality. I just hope the rest of us ARE the majority and eventually the others will be forced to see HRC for what she truly is.

Too many generalizations about 50% of the voting public, and it seems you're just making things up. Many of would be thrilled that we finally have a female in the White House, but that's not why we're voting for her.

Watching Fox News with a patient, and I can't find the poll, but recent polls about issues apparently show that the email scandal and Benghazi are no longer on voters minds, including Trump voters. Fox News rates the economy as the #1 issue on people's minds.

If Mrs. Clinton is to be defeated, it certainly is important to cast her as incompetent and a liar, however, beating a dead horse isn't going to get it.

Nothing really comes up on Google when I search for licksplitters.

Generalizing, hurling out insults, beating a dead horse will continue to alienate anyone one the fence. Good job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
She can infer all she wants about her own honestly.....it's public record that she has lied many many times.

So has Trump ... in fact, he's lied more.

Hillary Clinton:Hillary Clinton's file | PolitiFact

The PolitiFact scorecard

Donald Trump:http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The PolitiFact scorecard

So, you oppose Clinton because she lies, in favor of a candidate who lies even more.

Yup, definitely a values voter, there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cankles? Really?

And the word is "lickspittles".

And as for the misogynist rant, well ... whatever gets you through the night.

Misogyny and body-shaming.

Yup, definitely a values voter there, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Too many generalizations about 50% of the voting public, and it seems you're just making things up. Many of would be thrilled that we finally have a female in the White House, but that's not why we're voting for her.

Watching Fox News with a patient, and I can't find the poll, but recent polls about issues apparently show that the email scandal and Benghazi are no longer on voters minds, including Trump voters. Fox News rates the economy as the #1 issue on people's minds.

If Mrs. Clinton is to be defeated, it certainly is important to cast her as incompetent and a liar, however, beating a dead horse isn't going to get it.

Nothing really comes up on Google when I search for licksplitters.

Generalizing, hurling out insults, beating a dead horse will continue to alienate anyone one the fence. Good job.

what, exactly, am I making up? It's "Lickspittle" fyi. Attention to detail.

Repeating what is true IS likely to pull those off the fence, so yes, good job for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With Hillary's track record of lying, while in office, I honestly do not trust one thing she ever says. That millions think that is not important baffles me.

I agree. Tonight will be amazing!!!! The Debate Superbowl!!!!! Go Trump!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What could he possibly gain by that? Doesn't make sense. However, we'll agree to disagree. You give no examples, but I'm probably sure what you would call "fanning the flames" I would call being real and bringing it up for discussion, calling it like it is. Qualities that seem to be admired in Mr. Trump btw

For the right wing, any acknowledgement of racial issues is "race baiting". We're not supposed to talk about it, ever ... unless, of course, we're talking about how minority people see white folks. "Reverse racism" is apparently the only valid subject of discussion on the issue.

And, as another poster pointed out, Trump's pandering to the alt-right - which he seems to have turned over to his son now that he's pretending to care about Black communities - is race-baiting of the most poisonous kind. But that's OK because he's unPC and rich.

Speaking of the alt-right, I've read here and there that some of them are calling for the establishment of a White Homeland. Haven't they heard of Europe? Maybe we should send them all there ... only where would we build The Wall?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Privacy, Cookies, and Terms of Service Policies to learn more.