Stop-and-Frisk Practice Violated Rights, Judge Rules
4Aug 12, '13 by herring_RN GuideIn a repudiation of a major element in the Bloomberg administration's crime-fighting legacy, a federal judge has found that the stop-and-frisk tactics of the New York Police Department violated the constitutional rights of minorities in New York, and called for a federal monitor to oversee broad reforms. ...
... The mayor cited the benefits of stop-and-frisk, crediting the tactic for making the city safer and for ridding the streets of thousands of illegal guns.
But in her ruling, Judge Scheindlin found that in doing so, the police systematically stopped innocent people in the street without any objective reason to suspect them of wrongdoing.
The stops, which soared in number over the last decade as crime continued to decline, demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, as well as the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, according to the 195-page decision. ...
The decision: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...-decision.html
6Aug 12, '13 by aknottedyarnOur previous mayor used to have police photograph young men who were in groups on a corner, not doing anything illegal that was seen. The suspicion of drug dealing was the reason given but the photos basically were to establish that certain people had connections with each other. After much pressure it was stopped. Recently there were some discussions about bringing it back. Illegal searches are a significant problem.
All of us value our privacy. I would be rather indignant if police decided to search my purse. There is nothing to hide. It. is. mine. same for my vehicle, even more so for my person. Recently in Texas two women were stopped for driving issue. The police claimed they could smell pot. They had a female officer search the bodies of both women in public. The cop used gloves and checked anally, then vaginally, and then did the same with the second female. No change in gloves. Nothing was found.
That case caused one loss of job. Why would anyone think that such a violation would be acceptable? Because privacy has been stolen by so many for so long for not so good reasons privacy has been trampled and is no longer seen as a right.
I am glad that the court took up the case and hope it impacts other cities.
3Aug 12, '13 by herring_RN GuideBringing back the practice of acapella harmony singing groups lide the Doo Wop groups of the 50s or earlier Barber Shop Quartets would be a nice protest against harassment of teen on corners.
I thibnk in cities apartment dwellers and teens from large families often hang out on stoops and corners.
Review: 'Street Corner Symphonies: The Complete Story Of Doo-Wop' : NPR
This is recent, a bit older than teens, and in the subway not on a corner:
1Aug 13, '13 by CrufflerJJQuote from aknottedyarn"one loss of job"...well, almost....
That case caused one loss of job. Why would anyone think that such a violation would be acceptable? Because privacy has been stolen by so many for so long for not so good reasons privacy has been trampled and is no longer seen as a right....
Trooper Bui was initialy fired after performing the cavity search. Her partner was suspended.
On further investigation, the Texas Dept of Public Safety (and random cavity searches) decided to reinstate Trooper Bui on 8/9/13. Their justification was that the grand jury decided not to indict Bui, and that she (as a newbie) had been directed by a more senior Trooper to digitally rape...umm...I mean...search the "subjects."
Trooper who conducted cavity search reinstated | The TexasFred Blog
Trooper who conducted cavity search reinstated - Houston Chronicle
Once again, it suuuure is GREAT to live in a free country. The Eichman defense "I was only following orders" is alive & well.
1Aug 13, '13 by OfficerRNBSNI'm not sure why this made it to AllNurses, but I'll chime in. I think this is actually damning for police, however, let me qualify in saying that I am pro-Constitution. I believe in our Republic, and the law we have in place to effectively manage our Republic including our Fourth Amendment. For those of you that think we have a democracy...time to crack a book. Capitalizations provided for emphasis.
That said, Terry v. Ohio conceived the "stop" or detention based on reasonable suspicion (not probable cause aka reasonable cause) and a pat down or "frisk" based on reasonable suspicion (not probable cause). Prior to this the U.S. enjoyed either probably cause only or "we're the police, by God" approach to law enforcement.
I have no background on the article quoted by the OP, nor the time to read it, but if officers were basing these searches on reasonable suspicion then we have lost something very important if the RS is now being questioned by judges.
2Aug 13, '13 by herring_RN GuideThe Wall Street Journal reports that NYPD's Stop-and-Frisk in 2011 questioned and frisked about 684,330 people.
92 percent of those stopped were males, and 87 percent of those stopped were black or Hispanic.
12 percent of those stopped were arrested.
3Aug 13, '13 by aknottedyarnBasically it seems that in NYC as well as other locales "reasonable suspicion" was if one was a male person of color or with a male person of color. I have read reports of people who were stopped only because they were with a Black male. I suspect that the same would hold true if with a male Hispanic.
In our area, racially predominantly Black in the city and mixed with white majority in the suburbs, Some places are totally integrated and mindsets have changed from the past. Case in point: Today I went to Home Depot with my friend who does a great deal of the maintenance for our building. He saw a worker and asked for help finding a part. I walked up the same isle a few steps behind as I had stopped to look at something else. The worker helped him, acknowledged me, and continued to help my friend. Obviously he did not know we were together. In the not so distant past I could imagine my friend getting a brushoff by the worker to assist someone like me. Today no one looks at us funny as we travel together. A few years ago in a different community I did something similar with another friend who happened to also be black. The sales person immediately stopped helping that person and wanted to help me. At least in some places color is not as much of an issue.
The police here certainly are not that open minded. We have huge problems of violent crime. My friend and I were talking about the easy access to guns. His POV: those who are supplying the guns illegally to those who are involved in violent crimes are doing so in hopes that the AA youth will kill each other off. My job includes me looking at crime photos. The guns used for murders are so marked up. One gun photo I recently saw had notches scratched into the metal. I hope my thoughts are wrong but my friend confirmed that yes, they were what I thought.
I am not sure what reasonable suspicion might be. I see tinted windows as a frequent reason to stop and search in police reports. Brake lights, tail lights that magically work before and after the stop are also used as reasons. Just this week "weaving in one lane" was given as reason to stop and search. I believe there may be reasons to stop. If you want to search then get a warrant. If a judge will not sign it then you don't get to search. The judge can decide in some cases what reasonable suspicion might be. In NYC as elsewhere those in power will continue until a big enough lawsuit is presented to drive it to a higher court.
2Aug 14, '13 by TheCommuter, ASN, RN Senior ModeratorQuote from OfficerRNBSNThis story made it to the 'blue side' of Allnurses.com (a.k.a. the Break Room), where we discuss current events, politics, finances, family life, and all types of topics that are not directly related to nursing.I'm not sure why this made it to AllNurses, but I'll chime in.
Anything unrelated to nursing is fair game for discussion in our virtual Break Room.