First Amendment - page 2
In 1964 I began paying attention to the First Amendment. At UC Berkeley Mario Savio became the leader of the student free speech movement after students were arrested for talking about the civil... Read More
Oct 2Very well said, Baloney.
Many Whites just don't see racism until it smacks THEM in the face. Until then, there is no problem. We are all equal (said with tongue in cheek)!
I have never purchased a football jersey. But I am thinking about buying a Kaepernick shirt. I guess I have to get his college jersey, since he no longer plays with a team.
A bar in northern KY is allowing fans to come and burn NFL jerseys. I may call them today to ask when they plan to have a mass burning copies of the Constitution.
Oct 2And now we have another lone shooter mass killing that would be a terrorist attack if the fellow had been brown or black.
Oct 4Quote from toomuchbaloneyIf Only Stephen Paddock Were a Muslim - The New York TimesAnd now we have another lone shooter mass killing that would be a terrorist attack if the fellow had been brown or black.
Nov 12The FCC destroys both the 1st amendment and the 10th in a single blow. Constitution is on life support. Last thing to go with be guns.
Nov 12Quote from ninsx003?The FCC destroys both the 1st amendment and the 10th in a single blow. Constitution is on life support. Last thing to go with be guns.
Maybe you could elaborate.
Nov 13Quote from ninsx003Is Putin still putting his pants on, one leg at a time?The FCC destroys both the 1st amendment and the 10th in a single blow. Constitution is on life support. Last thing to go with be guns.
Nov 13Perhaps it was regarding this:
High Court Could Aid FCC Title II Rollback
... WASHINGTON - Critics of Republican Federal Communications Commission chair Ajit Pai have been pressing him to commit fully and unequivocally to not regulating issues based on the content of speech. However, a supporter of his network neutrality stance is using that same argument to justify Pai's planned rollback of Title II-based rules.
Specifically at issue is the Open Internet order's allowance for one type of discrimination - family friendly filtering - and not others.
A Supreme Court ruling made since the order was adopted would appear to make that allowance an unconstitutional content-based restriction - difficult to justify in court.
After President Donald Trump tweeted his suggestion that news outlets running stories he didn't like should perhaps have their licenses challenged and revoked, Congressional Democrats and media activist groups, joined by journalists and many others, were up in arms.
The idea that the content of speech should determine its regulatory protection, or the lack of it, ruffled many a feather....
... Skorup says he thinks the FCC's 2015 Open Internet order, which treated ISPs as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act , has a rocky First Amendment road. "The Supreme Court clarified its standard for what is content-based," he said, "and I think the rules and the order discriminate against different types of content."...
High Court Could Aid FCC Title II Rollback | Multichannel