It's almost like the executive branch equivalent of "the dog ate my homework."

  1. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...tary%20Service


    SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

    Friday, July 9, 2004 - Last updated 8:03 p.m. PT

    Pentagon: Bush military records destroyed

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    WASHINGTON -- Military payroll records that could more fully document President Bush's whereabouts during his service in the Texas Air National Guard were inadvertently destroyed, according to the Pentagon.

    In a letter responding to a freedom of information request by The Associated Press, the Defense Department said that microfilm containing the pertinent National Guard payroll records was damaged and could not be salvaged. The damaged material included payroll records for the first quarter of 1969 and the third quarter of 1972.

    "President Bush's payroll records for those two quarters were among the records destroyed," wrote C.Y. Talbott, of the Pentagon's Freedom of Information and Security Review section. "Searches for back-up paper copies of the missing records were unsuccessful."

    Presidential spokeswoman Claire Buchan said Friday there was nothing new in the letter. "When we put out records in February, we indicated that third-quarter of 1972 records were lost" when the microfilm was destroyed, she said.

    Bush did not perform Guard duties during the third quarter of 1972 but "fulfilled his obligation to the National Guard in full," Buchan said. "The documents we released months ago make that clear."

    In February, the White House released some payroll and medical records from Bush's Vietnam-era service to counter Democrats' suggestions that he shirked his duty in the Texas Air National Guard.

    Bush was in the Texas Air National Guard from 1968 to 1973, much of the time as a pilot, but never went to Vietnam or flew in combat. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the Democratic presidential candidate, is a decorated Vietnam veteran, and some Democrats have questioned whether Bush showed up for temporary Guard duty in Alabama while working on a political campaign during a one-year period from May 1972 to May 1973.

    Bush had asked to be able to transfer temporarily from the Texas Guard to an Alabama base during that time so he could work on the Senate campaign of a family friend. Reports differ on how long he was actually in Alabama, but it's generally believed that he returned to his Texas unit after the November 1972 election. The White House says Bush went back to Alabama again after that.

    The Pentagon letter was sent in response to an April lawsuit filed by the AP under the federal Freedom of Information Act. That law requires government agencies to make public information not specifically exempted for disclosure.

    The letter said that in 1996 and 1997, the Pentagon "engaged with limited success in a project to salvage deteriorating microfilm." During the process, "the microfilm payroll records of numerous service members were damaged," the letter said.

    This process resulted in "the inadvertent destruction of microfilm containing certain National Guard payroll records," including Bush's, the letter said.

    Trying to calm the political unrest, the White House on Feb. 13 released Bush's Vietnam-era military records to counter suggestions he shirked his duty. But there was no new evidence given at that time to show that he was in Alabama during the period when Democrats questioned whether he performed his service obligation.

    The records showed that Bush, a pilot, was suspended from flying status beginning Aug. 1, 1972, because of his failure to have an annual medical examination. His last flight exam was on May 15, 1971. There were no new documents, during that February release, to shed any light on Bush's service in Alabama.
    •  
  2. 10 Comments

  3. by   Mkue
    I'm wondering why this wasn't an issue prior to the 2000 election. Oh well, politics as usual.
  4. by   fergus51
    I thought it was.

    If it wasn't, that might be because Bush wasn't trying to paint himself as such a champion of the military (remember mission accomplished party?).
    Last edit by fergus51 on Jul 10, '04
  5. by   movealong
    Not to forget him dressing up in a flight suit on deck for photo ops!
    Last edit by movealong on Jul 10, '04
  6. by   maureeno
    the guy is bona fide!

    I've got my GWB
    Elite Force Naval Aviator
    fully articulated
    1/6 scale collectible doll...
  7. by   pickledpepperRN
    "If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence." -- Bertrand Russell, Roads to Freedom

    http://www.newamericancentury.org/
    http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqsep1898.htm
    http://www.newamericancentury.org/ir...t2000-1997.htm
    http://www.newamericancentury.org/st...principles.htm
    http://www.thefourreasons.org/pnac.htm
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hegemony (Had to look up this word. I also need a large type dictionary.)
    http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
    http://www.brusselstribunal.org/
    http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/au...-a01_prn.shtml
    http://www.yourdictionary.com/ahd/p/p0636100.html
    http://www.thefourreasons.org/victimsofwar.htm Warning - graphic photos
    Last edit by pickledpepperRN on Jul 10, '04
  8. by   Gomer
    Reminds me of those missing 18-minutes on the Nixon tapes....lost but not forgotten.
  9. by   dphrn
    Oh my goodness, we're back to this again.
  10. by   donmurray
    It never went away... This is fascinating too..Who said "Fairweather friend"? :chuckle

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/bushlay5.html
  11. by   Hellllllo Nurse
    Quote from dphrn
    Oh my goodness, we're back to this again.

    This article is dated July 8, 2004. Two days ago.

    This issue is ongoing.
  12. by   movealong
    I truthfully didn't care that much. But if someone tries to present themselves in a certain light ie: dressing a flight jumpsuit, then once introduced, it deserves to be examined.
    You can't have your cake and eat it too.

close